APAC CIOOutlook

Advertise

with us

  • Technologies
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Big Data
      • Blockchain
      • Cloud
      • Digital Transformation
      • Internet of Things
      • Low Code No Code
      • MarTech
      • Mobile Application
      • Security
      • Software Testing
      • Wireless
  • Industries
      • E-Commerce
      • Education
      • Logistics
      • Retail
      • Supply Chain
      • Travel and Hospitality
  • Platforms
      • Microsoft
      • Salesforce
      • SAP
  • Solutions
      • Business Intelligence
      • Cognitive
      • Contact Center
      • CRM
      • Cyber Security
      • Data Center
      • Gamification
      • Procurement
      • Smart City
      • Workflow
  • Home
  • CXO Insights
  • CIO Views
  • Vendors
  • News
  • Conferences
  • Whitepapers
  • Newsletter
  • Awards
Apac
  • Artificial Intelligence

    Big Data

    Blockchain

    Cloud

    Digital Transformation

    Internet of Things

    Low Code No Code

    MarTech

    Mobile Application

    Security

    Software Testing

    Wireless

  • E-Commerce

    Education

    Logistics

    Retail

    Supply Chain

    Travel and Hospitality

  • Microsoft

    Salesforce

    SAP

  • Business Intelligence

    Cognitive

    Contact Center

    CRM

    Cyber Security

    Data Center

    Gamification

    Procurement

    Smart City

    Workflow

Menu
    • Project Management
    • Cyber Security
    • Hotel Management
    • Workflow
    • E-Commerce
    • Business Intelligence
    • MORE
    #

    Apac CIOOutlook Weekly Brief

    ×

    Be first to read the latest tech news, Industry Leader's Insights, and CIO interviews of medium and large enterprises exclusively from Apac CIOOutlook

    Subscribe

    loading

    THANK YOU FOR SUBSCRIBING

    • Home
    Editor's Pick (1 - 4 of 8)
    left
    Major Divestiture Amplifies Need for Project Management Governance

    Sheryl Haislet, VP-IT & CIO, Adient

    Successful Agile Adoption: Changing Culture, Not Process

    Renee Geary, Head of Transformation and PMO, Catholic Church Insurance

    Understanding Consumer Behavior through the Lens of Behavioral Economics

    Jordan Birnbaum, VP and Chief Behavioral Economist, ADP [NASDAQ: ADP]

    Accelerating the Evolution of Project Management

    Andrew Macpherson, Executive Director, Project and Programme Management, Asia, Arcadis

    Understanding the dynamics of a Project Manager

    Kiran Marri, Chief Scientist, Digital Engineering & Testing Services, CSS Corp

    Project Management and the role of the Project Manager in an Agile world

    Craig Lauchlan, General Manager, Customer Experience Transformation, AGL Energy

    Why most of Singapore's CIOs are Turning to Contract IT Workers

    Matthieu Imbert-Bouchard, Managing Director, Robert Half Singapore

    The Role of Technology in Transforming the Incredible Shrinking Office into the Incredibly Productive Office

    Amy Barzdukas, Workplace Evangelist and CMO, Plantronics

    right

    The Art of Getting the Right Things Done

    Mattias Hallberg, CIO and Board Member, Wahl and Case

    Tweet
    content-image

    Mattias Hallberg, CIO and Board Member, Wahl and Case

    In my 13 years of experience in managing projects, I have learned that ‘Doing the Right Project’ is often more difficult than ‘Doing the Project Right’. For both, large sources of knowledge are available and finding suitable processes in these areas is not difficult. However, I often see that when selecting which project to start, the C-suite commonly use only one or two parameters and sometimes just go on their gut feelings.

    Impact of Selecting a Low Priority Project

    Beside the potential opportunity loss, following are the negative sides starting projects in the wrong order:

    • Resources assigned to the project such as staff, equipment, and funding, will find their way to other, higher priority projects. There could either be a small trickle over time or a one-time substantial cut.

    • The project team will sooner or later discover that even though they succeed delivering within the stipulated time and budget their invested hours will have a small impact on the company’s bottom line.

    • It will be difficult to request dependent projects to adjust their schedules, resulting in delays.

    • As high priority scope items are put on hold in favor for this project, it is likely that some of them will be added as change requests, further slowing down the project and causing the team a lot of extra work.

    As result, despite having a clear project charter and all required resources assigned, the project is heading for doom. The team, trying their best to salvage the situation, realizes that this might affect their careers.

    In such a scenario, what do executives need to do to remedy the situation? Do they need to kick-start an initiative to design a new project approval process? And have all projects—which are about to start— follow it? Maybe, but it will take time. Is there no easier solution available?

    A Simple Project Selection Tool

    Let me present a method I learned from “Scaled Agile Framework”, a few years back. This takes a number of parameters into account when calculating project priority and offers some quality insight regarding financial impact of selecting one project over another. And, the additional advantage is that it is super easy to get started – just a whiteboard will do fine!

    First, it introduces the concept of “Cost of Delay,” expressed as the sum of Business Value plus Time Urgency plus Risk Reduction. This is to be regarded as the opportunity loss incurred by not having the product released. Now, in this simple model we are not interested in calculating the dollar value for this, instead we are only interested in knowing the relative difference for Cost of Delay (CoD) between projects.

    Table 1 is an example from an IT organization with a team of great engineers who can basically work on any type of project. Which one should they start with, #1 or #2 or #3?

    Table 1

    To fill in the numbers in red, IT and business stakeholders participate in a short workshop carrying out four different rounds of discussions (one per category) to agree on which value each project should have. They can only choose between the numbers 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, and 20, which have no units. This number series offers rather large jumps, which will ensure that long debates does not occur if the value should be 8 or 9, since this really does not matter much in this model. (Sometimes business side only joins Round 1 and 2 and IT only joins Round 3 and 4 due to domain expertise.)

    After quickly calculating the blue values in the columns on the right hand, we can see something important; it makes most sense starting with project #3, then #2, and last #1. The reason for this is that despite #3 has a low CoD, it can be released quickly and business can keep capitalizing on it while the IT organization continues working on the other longer projects.

    The Numbers

    There is a need to provide a proof, so that readers can make an informed decision regarding the usage of the model. Firstly, let’s assume that the whole team will be assigned only to one project at a time.

    What would be the total CoD in running the projects in the order 1, 2, 3 compared to 3, 2, 1 (details in Table 2?

    Case 1: Execute the projects in order by size

    Here, we can see that since we postpone project #2 and #3 for a long time, we will incur a high cost of delay.

    Case 2: Execute the projects in order of the new value for priority we calculated

    Here, we can see that since we released both #2 and #3 early, we don’t incur a large opportunity loss.

    Conclusion

    I strongly recommend taking efforts to find out which project should start first. This will improve both staff morale and financial results. If you have no current model for this, or have encountered too many inflated ROI calculations and question their credibility, I recommend first trying out, the above mentioned, Simple Project Selection Tool. This will provide important buy-in from both Business and IT side.

    tag

    Financial

    ROI

    Weekly Brief

    loading
    Top 10 Project Management Solution Companies - 2019
    ON THE DECK

    Project Management 2019

    I agree We use cookies on this website to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies. More info

    Read Also

    Artificial Intelligence - Myths And Truths

    Artificial Intelligence - Myths And Truths

    Geraldo Pereira Junior, Chief Information Officer, Ypê
    Sustainable Future through Innovative Technology Solutions

    Sustainable Future through Innovative Technology Solutions

    Faisal Parvez, Director, BT Business CIO
    The Future Relies on Augmented AI

    The Future Relies on Augmented AI

    Laurent Fresnel, CIO, The Star Entertainment Group
    Digitalization with the use of digital technologies/Improving business through digital technologies

    Digitalization with the use of digital technologies/Improving business through digital technologies

    Wilbertus Darmadi, CIO, Toyota Astra Motor
    How Marco's Pizza Leaned On Technology To Succeed Amid The Pandemic By Quickly Pivoting To Contact-Free Delivery And Curbside Carryout

    How Marco's Pizza Leaned On Technology To Succeed Amid The Pandemic By Quickly Pivoting To Contact-Free Delivery And Curbside Carryout

    Rick Stanbridge, VP & Chief Information Officer, Marco’s Pizza
    Bunnings  Diy Digital Transformation

    Bunnings Diy Digital Transformation

    Leah Balter, Chief Information Officer, Bunnings
    For a Smarter City: Trust the Data, Ignore the Hype

    For a Smarter City: Trust the Data, Ignore the Hype

    Brad Dunkle, Deputy CIO, City of Charlotte
    Smart Community Innovation for the Post Pandemic

    Smart Community Innovation for the Post Pandemic

    Harry Meier, Deputy Cio for Innovation, Department of Innovation and Technology, City of Mesa
    Loading...
    Copyright © 2025 APAC CIOOutlook. All rights reserved. Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy and Anti Spam Policy 

    Home |  CXO Insights |   Whitepapers |   Subscribe |   Conferences |   Sitemaps |   About us |   Advertise with us |   Editorial Policy |   Feedback Policy |  

    follow on linkedinfollow on twitter follow on rss
    This content is copyright protected

    However, if you would like to share the information in this article, you may use the link below:

    https://project-management.apacciooutlook.com/ciospeaks/the-art-of-getting-the-right-things-done-nwid-4551.html